Apr
05

The Few, The Proud, The Automotive Journalists

Yesterday the twitterverse and blogosphere were in an uproar over recent announcements by Hyundai and Nissan to conduct a contest where the winner would win a trip to the New York Auto Show along with press credentials and a chance to conduct their own report. Sounds rather harmless right? That was until the automotive journalist (or  automotive entertainers) decided to question the objectivity and biased of the winner’s reporting.

To these part-time writers extraordinaire Regular Joe doesn’t have the journalistic fortitude and immunity to temptation that comes with years of hard nosed journalism (read regurgitating press releases).  To many journalists a Joe, or Josephine to be politically correct, would be blinded by the glamor of an all expense paid trip to New York leading them to feel obligated to say absurd things like “the GT-R is impressive” or “I love the new Hyundai Elantra”.  How dare their objective views on styling be influenced by an OEM’s offer to wine and dine them. Very few have mentioned Nissan’s contest requires the applicant to currently own a Nissan vehicle. Biases all around;  journalistic blasphemy!

You see press days, press events and special drives are reserved for those press-pass carrying members of the automotive journalism club.  They are the only people in the world uniquely qualified to capture in words what a car feels like, smells like, drives like and can reword a press release in ten different ways making sure not to sound like the guy sitting to their left and right. Most of these guys drive bland late model cars and have an income equal to that of a certified mechanic.  They don’t do it for the money though they do it for the love (and access, free travel, food and whatever other swag and goodies an OEM throws their way). I find it hard to understand what makes auto journos more resilient to handouts and freebies than Regular Joe.

At the end of the day automotive companies want positive brand recognition and they want to sell cars. If plucking an enthusiast from the crowd of fans, pampering that person and then promoting their “story” as a marketing tool – then good on them! Please take a deep breath cause OEMs aren’t pulling their press fleet, nixing their press budgets or striking your name from their press release listserve. Your perks are safe……..for now.

I do see the future changing though. As OEM marketing dollars start to touch more& more people and they increase their personal conversations with customers in public forums – it almost begins to negate the need for unbiased automotive reviews. Cars will become activley and publicly peer-reviewed. Pretty soon the only type of automotive journalism left will be the one where reporters go out and get NEWS by asking questions, doing research and god forbid coming up with their own creative ideas.

The days of regurgitating press releases and aggregating news stories are coming to an end.  All that will be left standing are those who provide automotive news and automotive insight and those that produce very entertaining material.

Happy Motoring,

DCAG

2 comments
RonaldKramer
RonaldKramer

Open letter to Ford: I thought my 2013 C-MAX would be a Prius Killer? NOT! As a returning Ford buyer I feel deceived. I want to support US companies and US jobs. What was Ford thinking when they published 47/ 47/47 estimates? Based on the advertised EPA estimates, I would have been ok with low 40's but 28-33 mpg is not even in the ballpark. This is not an issue about EPA testing standards, but rather an issue about setting false customer expectations in order to promote sales. Ford's "47MPG" marketing campaign tarnished what should have been the roll out of a truly remarkable vehicle, the CMAX. Real world MPG estimates should have been promoted in the mid-30's. No one would have questioned those numbers and the CMAX would have received the accolades it deserves. How these MPG estimates made it through Ford corporate is beyond me! Maybe it was the rush to go to market? I have been accused of not knowing how to drive hybrid. For the record, during the last three years I have leased both a 2010 Prius and 2010 Honda Insight Hybrid, and consider myself an experienced hyper-miler. My mileage in the Prius is 50 plus, the Insight is 40 plus. The C-MAX is a well-built car, with extremely inflated EPA estimates. I respectfully request that this matter be investigated as soon as possible. My efforts to deal with this locally and through Ford customer service have frustrated me to no end. The constant response? "You need to learn to how to drive hybrid type of vehicle ". Is there a difference how I drive Prius Hybrid vs. the CMAX hybrid? I think we all know the answer to that. I need someone at Ford to reach out to me and assist in a proactive manner so we can put this matter to rest.  Ronald Kramer Yankee Ford Customer South Portland, Maine

 

Marquette
Marquette

Yea, after reading car mag publications, i don't think that they know any more than some Jo or Josephine. The big difference is that the journo has done it a lot longer and can spout out more stats aka fluff. It seems that in todays world of cars, 0-60 times, hp, mpg, and the way a car looks takes more precedence than anything else. So really, i suppose all you have to know is stats and you can somewhat intelligently explain a car or sell it. How many car salesmen have we come across who know nothing about the product they are selling? How many journos do you know who can explain what SH-AWD does, or how the GTR's awd system works, design vs bean counters and so on and so forth.

Ultimately, I say give me a break. Journos should take it down a notch and realize they don't do or say anything that I don't know or can't learn.